phiGT1 portal family documentation
Summary
This portal alignment combines the families of a variety of phage
families. Two families that have not been merged are the phi29-like
portal (although it is structurally homologous), and the phiKZ-like
portal (although it is a significant match, but only has confident
alignment over a relatively small number of residues.
Technical
This version of alignment was augmented with homologs of phiGT1,
LUZ24, and P22 portal proteins to improve definition in those
clades. As for large terminase, T4 and lambda are thought to
represent the most divergent clades aligned. The time of common
ancestor was estimated by congruence with a plurality of the
topology of the large terminase tree, mainly in the common ancestors
linking LUZ24, phiEco32, and phiM5. The alignment file was filtered
to retain only sequences with over 300 residues in alignment. 1723
sequences were included. Other technical details are as
described
Files included
- portal.doucmentation.html - this file
- portal.Pre3.over300.a2m - the SAM alignment
- portal.Pre3.over300.asc.mod - the SAM HMM
- portal.Pre3.over300.hmm - the hmmer3 HMM
- portal.Pre3.over300.hhm - the HHpred HMM
- portal.Pr.set4.mb.nex - nexus file used to make
timetree in [1]
Relationship to other portal models
The alignment and models include multiple Pfam portal families
including PF16510 (P22), PF04860 (Mu), PF05136.14 (lambda),
PF05133.15 (SPP1), PF07230.14 (T4); PF12236 (T7). Two families that
thus far have given too poor HMM to HMM similarity to include in the
alignment and models are from the phiKZ family and the phi29 family.
The phi29 portal has been structurally solved (pdb:6QZ9, Xu et al.,
2019). It is plainly structurally homologous, although the different
size and sequence similarity make alignment extremely difficult. The
phiKZ-like portal is just similar enough to have been identified by
HMM-HMM comparison (Cornelissen et al., 2011), but the extent of the
alignable segment would substantially reduce the number of validly
aligned columns if it were included using the current parameters.
Citations
Cornelissen A, Hardies SC, Shaburova OV, Krylov V, Mattheus W,
Kropinski AM, Lavigne R. 2011. Complete genome sequence
of the giant viruses OBP and comparative genome analysis of the
diverse phiKZ-related phages. J Virol 86:1844-52. doi:
10.1128/JVI.06330-11.
Xu J, Wang D, Gui M, Xiang Y. 2019. Structural assembly of the
tailed bacteriophage phi29. Nat.Commun. 10:2366 doi:
10.1038/s41467-019-10272-3.